iMailVOTE.com
HOME BroadTVcasting
1-2-3Get-out-VOTE!
DIE! or unite
*BUSINESS1-2-3PLAN
United States
VOTE
iMailVOTE.com
CandidatesVOTE?
United StatesGIG
smartHOLLYWOODfilms
GIGgrid+60millionXFaster
phoneFREESERVICE
CleanElectricGrid.com
TrueNightmare.com
HOW? SEE *BUSINESS1-2-3PLAN.com Get-out-VOTE!
VOTE!
Johnny
By: Media Eva! 206-664-1945
iMailVOTE.com mission is to ensure every eligible American can vote, and to ensure every vote cast is accurately recorded and counted.

(read below)
*PURGING (STATE OFFICIALS REMOVE VOTES) regularly remove “purge" citizens from voter rolls secretly with no public disclosure notice to you!

iMailVOTE.com Voting Rights & Elections Project

Good News!
iMailVOTE generates a countingVOTE delay in the time zone results, as ballots keep coming in days after States election dead line, makes Vote-By-Mail very honest as States on the East Coast cannot be counted first interfering or persuading with the voters choice on the West Coast, as has been the case in many past elections.

Voters who fill out their Vote-By-Mail on election day may instead of standing in line at their polling place may either go to the post office and drop it off. or let the post carrier pick it from their mail box. All mail-in-ballots must be post marked by the day of the election to count.
Vote-By-Mail gives a longer time countingVOTES as mail-in ballots verses rushing standing in line on election day.

Order your Vote-By-Mail, LongDistanceVoter.org will help you get your absentee ballot &
know your State's absentee
iMailVOTE ballot deadline rules and requirements.

We know each non-voter by name!
iMailVOTE with smartdeviceTVitFREE, contacts each missing voter, interacts each person individually providing each their best tools and requirements to Get-out-VOTE! Informing each voter that their vote counts and certainly would swing any decision. However, it's politicians job to address each voters concerns for change, iMailVOTE with TVitFREE only delivers to convince Get-out-VOTE!

".. individuals vote because they expect to be asked, and they anticipate the disutility associated with admitting to not voting, or with lying about voting magnifies get-out-vote and turnout for presidential elections."

"Anyone may see your voting record knowing whether you're a committed citizen. Because others will ask you, the average being asked even once of being a non-voter suffers low social-image value syndrome."

November 30, 2014, Washington State has 3,906,906 active registered voters. Approximately 76% of the state's voting eligible population is registered to vote, according to Voter Registration Database (VRDB) data and the 2010 census data. 1,945,000 or 58% WA eligable citizen voters did not vote, and 24% WA State eligible citizen voters ARE NOT REGISTERED. How many eligible voters are in your State do not VOTE? How may we contact this winning
votingVOTE group to VOTE?

Washingtonians cite their reasons why they won't vote saying the odds are no better than 50-50 that they will: They would vote if contacted, however they aren't excited about either candidate. Their vote doesn't really matter. And nothing ever gets done, anyway.

*PURGING (STATE OFFICIALS REMOVE VOTES) regularly remove “purge" citizens from voter rolls.

Voter registration lists, also called voter rolls, are the gateway to voting. Election officials across the country are routinely striking millions of voters from the rolls through a process that is shrouded in secrecy, prone to error, and vulnerable to manipulation

Eligible registered citizens can show up to vote and discover their names have been removed from the voter lists. States maintain voter rolls in an inconsistent and unaccountable manner. Officials strike voters from the rolls through a process that is shrouded in secrecy, prone to error, and vulnerable to manipulation.

A citizen typically cannot cast a vote that will count unless his/her name appears on the voter registration rolls. Yet state and local officials regularly remove, “purge" citizens from voter rolls. Thirty-nine states and the District of Columbia reported purging more than 13 million voters from registration rolls between 2004 and 2006. Purges, if done properly, are an important way to ensure that voter rolls are dependable, accurate, and up-to-date. Precise and carefully conducted purges can remove duplicate names, and people who have moved, died, or are otherwise ineligible.

While the lack of transparency in purge practices precludes a precise figure of the number of those erroneously purged, we do know that purges have been conducted improperly before. In 2004, for example, Florida planned to remove 48,000 “suspected felons” from its voter rolls. Many of those identified were in fact eligible to vote. The flawed process generated a list of 22,000 African Americans to be purged, but only 61 voters with Hispanic surnames, notwithstanding Florida’s sizable Hispanic population. Under pressure from voting rights groups, Florida ordered officials to stop using the purge list. Although this purge was uncovered and mostly stopped before it was completed, other improper purges may go undetected and unremedied.

The secret and inconsistent manner in which purges are conducted make it difficult, if not impossible, to know exactly how many voters are stricken from voting lists erroneously. And when purges are made public, they often reveal serious problems. Here are a few examples:

• Mississippi, a local election official discovered that another official had wrongly purged 10,000 voters from her home computer just a week before a presidential primary.

• Muscogee, Georgia, a county official purged 700 people from the voter lists, supposedly because they were ineligible to vote due to criminal convictions. The list included people who had never even received a parking ticket.

• Louisiana, including areas hit hard by hurricanes, officials purged approximately 21,000 voters, ostensibly for registering to vote in another state, without sufficient voter protections.

Findings

Purges rely on error-ridden lists. States regularly attempt to purge voter lists of ineligible voters or duplicate registration records, but the lists that states use as the basis for purging are often riddled with errors. For example, some states purge their voter lists based on the Social Security Administration’s Death Master File, a database that even the Social Security Administration admits includes people who are still alive. Even though Hilde Stafford, a Wappingers Falls, NY resident, was still alive and voted, the master death index lists her date of death as June 15, 1997. As another example, when a member of a household files a change of address for herself in the United States Postal Service’s National Change of Address database, it sometimes has the effect of changing the addresses of all members of that household. Voters who are eligible to vote are wrongly stricken from the rolls because of problems with underlying source lists.

Voters are purged secretly and without notice. None of the states investigated required election officials to provide any advance public notice of a systematic purge. Additionally, with the exception of registrants believed to have changed addresses, many states do not notify individual voters before purging them. In large part, states that do provide individualized notice do not provide such notice for all classes of purge candidates. For example, it is rare for states to provide notice when a registrant is believed to be deceased.

Without proper notice, an erroneously purged voter will likely not be able to correct the error before Election Day. Without public notice of an impending purge, the public is not be able to detect improper purges, or to hold their election officials accountable for more accurate voter list maintenance.

Bad “matching” criteria leaves voters vulnerable to manipulated purges. Many voter purges are conducted with problematic techniques that leave ample room for abuse and manipulation. State statutes rely on the discretion of election officials to identify registrants for removal. Far too often, election officials believe they have “matched” two voters, when they are actually looking at the records of two distinct individuals with similar identifying information. These cases of mistaken identity cause eligible voters to be wrongly removed from the rolls.

Florida purge in 2000, conservative estimates place the number of wrongfully purged voters was close to 12,000 was generated in part by bad matching criteria. Florida registrants were purged from the rolls if 80 percent of the letters of their last names were the same as those of persons with criminal convictions. Those wrongly purged included Reverend Willie D. Whiting Jr., who, under the matching criteria, was considered the same person as Willie J. Whiting. Without specific guidelines for or limitations on the authority of election officials conducting purges, eligible voters are regularly made unnecessarily vulnerable.

Insufficient oversight leaves voters vulnerable to manipulated purges. Insufficient oversight permeates the purge process beyond just the issue of matching. For example, state statutes often rely on the discretion of election officials to identify registrants for removal and to initiate removal procedures.

Washington State, the failure to deliver a number of delineated mailings, including precinct reassignment notices, ballot applications, and registration acknowledgment notices, triggers the mailing of address confirmation notices, which then sets in motion the process for removal on account of change of address.

State statutes fail to specify clear limitations on the authority of election officials to purge registrants, where insufficient oversight leaves room for election officials to deviate from what the state law provides and may make voters vulnerable to poor, lax, or irresponsible decision-making.

No effective national standard governs voter purges; in fact, methods vary from state to state and even from county to county. A voter’s risk of being purged depends in part on where in the state he or she lives. The lack of consistent rules and procedures means that this risk is unpredictable and difficult to guard against. While some variation is inevitable, every American should benefit from basic protections against erroneous purges.

Policy Recommendations

A. Transparency and Accountability for Purges

States should:
• Develop and publish uniform, non-discriminatory rules for purges.
• Provide public notice of an impending purge. Two weeks before any county-wide or state-wide purge, states should announce the purge and explain how it is to be conducted. Individual voters must be notified and given the opportunity to correct any errors or omissions, or demonstrate eligibility before they are stricken from the rolls.
• Develop and publish rules for an individual to prevent or remedy her erroneous inclusion in an impending purge. Eligible citizens should have a clear way to restore their names to voter rolls.
• Stop using failure to vote as a trigger for a purge. States should send address confirmation notices only when they believe a voter has moved.
• Develop directives and criteria with respect to the authority to purge voters. The removal of any record should require authorization by at least two officials.
• Preserve purged voter registration records.
• Make purge lists publicly available.

B. Strict Criteria for the Development of Purge Lists

States should:
• Ensure a high degree of certainty that names on a purge list belong there. Purge lists should be reviewed multiple times to ensure that only ineligible voters are included.
• Establish strict criteria for matching voter lists with other sources.
• Audit purge source lists. If purge lists are developed by matching names on the voter registration list to names from other sources like criminal conviction lists, the quality and accuracy of the information in these lists should be routinely “audited” or checked.
• Monitor duplicate removal procedures. States should implement uniform rules and procedures for eliminating duplicate registrations.

C. “Fail-Safe” Provisions to Protect Voters

States should ensure that:
• No voter is turned away from the polls because her name is not found on the voter rolls. Instead, would-be voters should be given provisional ballots, to which they are entitled under the law.
• Election workers are given clear instructions and adequate training as to HAVA’s provisional balloting requirements.

D. Universal Voter Registration

States should:
• Take the affirmative responsibility to build clean voter rolls consisting of all eligible citizens. Building on other government lists or using other innovative methods, states can make sure that all eligible citizens, and only eligible citizens, are on the voter rolls.
• Ensure that voters stay on the voter rolls when they move within the state.
• Provide a fail-safe mechanism of Election Day registration for those individuals who are missed or whose names are erroneously purged from the voter rolls.

TVitFREE!
BroadTVcasting
First-run syndication
Frank@ADDitTV.com
Get-out-VOTE! 206-664-1945 TEXT ME!
KING had a Dream needs Plan of Action! Are you afraid?
109+million non-voters watch a smartdeviceTV in your pocket!
All Together Now 1-2-3 (Beatles song) WINS+JOBS!+GO GREEN
1-2-3 TVitFREE first-run syndication TV/movies/news/sports attractions WINS! 91.5%
voter turnout! 316+million decision making to
Get-out-VOTE! SEE *BUSINESS1-2-3PLAN
2. +JOBS! UnitedStatesGIG OpticFiberInternet GIGgrid +60XFaster across America rural
areas, upgrades jobs! smartdevice
TVitFREE smartHOLLYWOODfilms ad revenue pays, not you!
3. +GO GREEN YOU SAVE! FREE GIGgrid upgrading to CleanElectricGrid & phoneFREEservice

I need your Support ADVOCATE NOW! SEE *BUSINESS1-2-3PLAN TVitFREE Get-out-VOTE! campaign
Your State @.02 per non-voter *2010 Census Bureau counting
VOTE.com Total start-up necessary $1,836,000.
You receive start-up investment credit @.05 per view your public message any areas 91.5% Get-out-
VOTE!
CONTACT: Frank D'orr Family EVA@votingVOTE.com 206-664-1945 TEXT ME!
KING had a Dream needs a Plan! "upgrade" BaltimoreGIG.com
Easy~Fast VOTE from home you're the countingVOTE!
Ballots arrive days after "delaying" State dead line time zones.

TVitFREE teaches how-to Vote-By-Mail your State's
absentee
iMailVOTE ballot deadline rules & requirements.

109+million DID NOT VOTE
SURVEY SAYS: They would vote by mail, not stand in line.
VOTE!
by:
EvaDorr.com
To Predict Future is 1-2-3 Create it! TVitFREE
Vote-By-Mail .com
smartdevice
Survey says: Non-Voters could be drawn by being better informed.
WHAT WILL CONVINCE 109+MILLION NON-VOTERS TO VOTE?
109+million non-voters already watch a smartdeviceTV in your pocket!
I need your Support! SEE *BUSINESS1-2-3PLAN Get-out-VOTE!